Between 2000-2003 many people were led to believe that the European Union's knowledgeboard.com was intended to be the most open experiment for Human Knowledge Management and Peoples Economics. It had been chmapioned as a critical open space need by Unseen Welath researchers whsoe year 2000 reports on the future were chaired out of Washington DC instituitions: Brookings Economics Institute and Georgetown Law School. Befitting the evolution of a service and network learning century untiting the globes localities: integrating how valu exchnagee subsystems compund purposeful contexts through transparency maps, which can be openly catalogued and explored below by indexing how the connectivities K1*K2*K3*K4*K5 flow and multiply future goodwill or badwill
These people included a knowledge angels network of well over 100 people who were encouraged to pay their own way to meet in open spaces in London, Berlin and Luxembourg; to identify future curricula of KM which had not been understood well in 2000, and to work out alumni networks around each. All of this extraordinary experimentation was suddenly discouraged towards the end of 2003, leaving a community without the 100 action learners who had most connected it and deep lines of inquiry that each knowledge angel had shown their personal time and interest in exploring. Moreover a connected view of knowledge management had been encouraged by the EU who spent hundreds of millions of Euros on surrounding programs including :
Knowledge Society - how to integrate the best of 25 countries open capabilities
Need for Lifelong Learning
Need for Corporate Responsibility
and other programmes (please help us list what else was connected while millennial optimised in what the internetworking world could achieve for humanity's progress was at its peak)
K1 how a free to join virtual community could connect professions in a networked age where the experience/learning curves and productivities of people to make a difference
* integrating
K2 group formats such as teams, practice communities and social networks, and such interdisciplinary content hubs as emotional intelligence
* integrating
K3 Gravitation of transparent organisational leadership governed as a purpose compounding system of productive & demanding relationships
*integrating
K4 integrating into the most valuable future exponential for its global market sector
to serve people
*integrating
K5 harmonising sustainably with societies' investments and knowledge collaboration city, 2 million global villages and other constructs that recognise the need to connect:
1) places of diversity being ultimately where all longest-term cultural, natural and human resource investment is sustained even whilst death of distance means that peoples mentors and work may connect many different places.
This section will collate some general background. The K links connect some conversations looking at the 5 productivity dimensions that could be integrated in the peoples economics which entrepreneurial revolutionaries have been sharing in knowledge dialogue networks for 30 years, and which leading economists, future historians, technology inventors and investors in people forecast to be a critical exponential in globalisation's future as compounding goodwill or badwill across humanity - with 2005-2010 being a final turning point for what 21st century evolves and whether 30000 projects uniting the greatest care for and with 6 billion beings will be openly linked together in time
A critical incident for anyone who maps the people relation dynamics of open networks: the 5 most linked people in knowledgeboard's community (including the one responsible for animating content on not for profit missions where the whole community of nearly 10000 members could connect in inspiring goals) and vision at the end of 2003 were given such awful times by the European Union and a new breed of separatist administrators that took over knowledgeboard that they had all gone by middle of 2005. To start 2006, knowledgeboard is changing its platform, and it is unclear what dialogues of the years that KnowledgeBoard could have fulfilled the greatest example of what meta-disciplinary knowledge through virtual community media and real networks connecting Europe's 25 countries with the world could do. So we have tried to record some of these indexed by which of the 5 K dimensions the conversation seems to have been at (though obviously connections across the K's are more important than each. Click any K to see what we have preserved. If you have found something that was at the old knowledgeboard that you want linked in to the 5 value multiplying dimensions of knowledge please mail to wcbn007@easynet.co.uk
Since knowledgeboard's future for humanity depended on what economists over the last 2 centuries have learnt about global and local media sectors, we briefly review this - more at value100:
investors stakes (including the peoples in such public media as the British Broadcasting Corporation) can be returned 100 fold over a generation but only if the medium multiplies 1000 fold value across the societies it connects, and does not exclude neighbouring societies from interacting (so their cultures and communities multiply transparently)
Always ask what the founders one or two main themes were, and whether the current meta-editorial team are still networking those themes (if not why and how will now be losing from spending time with the media if they assume its compounding the same cultural DNA and open leadership values as it originally planted). At value100 and FutureofLondon, and Beyond-Branding, we provide links to how such British media as The Economist and the BBC globalised, and we will also note that the birth of the worldwideweb depended on the British cultural philosophy of public media . Its as true withy how the future of a media sector evolves as it is at the top of a global corporation or a powerful nation that ultimately a few people make decisions on which the future welfare of millions or now billions is interconnected. Do these few love the future purpose and transparency and hi-trust that every humanly great institution that compounded over time once gravitated.
For example since most citizens' and netizens' lives are ruled by strictures of economics, we now need to inquire whether economics as a schooling is still stewarded the way those who originally chartered why women and men would always need constitutions enabling the most transparent possible searches and connections with how compound future exponentials are linked through time and the deepest historical beliefs humanity has come to communally trust (sometimes referred to with such terms as cultures and diversity and communion around social goodwill)
Today when we look at the world's 1000 biggest organisations of all typologies, we see a huge risk. Never have such a large percentage of the world's 1000 largest organisations deviated from their founding communal trusts - contexts that system*system mapmakers of these value exchanges turn into network pictures of gravitational epicentres around which connections of human relations of productivities (ehg K1*K2*K3*K4*K5) and demands.
Physical spaces like cities 1 2 3 4 need to be governed as a media (the people's spaces, cafe stages, forums and speakers corners (now most usually blogged)) model as much as any other type of model (eg transport/distribution or in the case of capitals a hub of how national constitutions interact sustainably for humanity). Indeed the ultimate challenge of sustaining 6 billion beings in productive and demanding joys has been mapped over 30 years of entrepreneurial revolution debates hosted by stewards of peoples economics as depending on the 2 million global village networking paradigm that Schumacher coined, linking with such truth-testing community and collaboration knowledge economics as Gandhi founded and Einstein endorsed and Johnny non Neumann assumed would be inspirationally interconnected for peoples around his catalytic intervention (obscene interest were his words for how much of his life he devoted to this collaboration technology) into the age of computing. In the example of the moon race, he would have been overjoyed at what productivity collaborative teams of people could achieve. Ever since he must be turning in his grave at how computers have been used by people with large financial budgets to cut people (tangible accounting's governing rule is to invest in machines and cut people). Never in the course of human history has the new collaborative economics, that could have multiplied service and action learning curves of 6 billion beings productive differences, been so opaquely desecrated by so few, professionally self-interested and backward sighted people.
These people included a knowledge angels network of well over 100 people who were encouraged to pay their own way to meet in open spaces in London, Berlin and Luxembourg; to identify future curricula of KM which had not been understood well in 2000, and to work out alumni networks around each. All of this extraordinary experimentation was suddenly discouraged towards the end of 2003, leaving a community without the 100 action learners who had most connected it and deep lines of inquiry that each knowledge angel had shown their personal time and interest in exploring. Moreover a connected view of knowledge management had been encouraged by the EU who spent hundreds of millions of Euros on surrounding programs including :
Knowledge Society - how to integrate the best of 25 countries open capabilities
Need for Lifelong Learning
Need for Corporate Responsibility
and other programmes (please help us list what else was connected while millennial optimised in what the internetworking world could achieve for humanity's progress was at its peak)
K1 how a free to join virtual community could connect professions in a networked age where the experience/learning curves and productivities of people to make a difference
* integrating
K2 group formats such as teams, practice communities and social networks, and such interdisciplinary content hubs as emotional intelligence
* integrating
K3 Gravitation of transparent organisational leadership governed as a purpose compounding system of productive & demanding relationships
*integrating
K4 integrating into the most valuable future exponential for its global market sector
to serve people
*integrating
K5 harmonising sustainably with societies' investments and knowledge collaboration city, 2 million global villages and other constructs that recognise the need to connect:
1) places of diversity being ultimately where all longest-term cultural, natural and human resource investment is sustained even whilst death of distance means that peoples mentors and work may connect many different places.
This section will collate some general background. The K links connect some conversations looking at the 5 productivity dimensions that could be integrated in the peoples economics which entrepreneurial revolutionaries have been sharing in knowledge dialogue networks for 30 years, and which leading economists, future historians, technology inventors and investors in people forecast to be a critical exponential in globalisation's future as compounding goodwill or badwill across humanity - with 2005-2010 being a final turning point for what 21st century evolves and whether 30000 projects uniting the greatest care for and with 6 billion beings will be openly linked together in time
A critical incident for anyone who maps the people relation dynamics of open networks: the 5 most linked people in knowledgeboard's community (including the one responsible for animating content on not for profit missions where the whole community of nearly 10000 members could connect in inspiring goals) and vision at the end of 2003 were given such awful times by the European Union and a new breed of separatist administrators that took over knowledgeboard that they had all gone by middle of 2005. To start 2006, knowledgeboard is changing its platform, and it is unclear what dialogues of the years that KnowledgeBoard could have fulfilled the greatest example of what meta-disciplinary knowledge through virtual community media and real networks connecting Europe's 25 countries with the world could do. So we have tried to record some of these indexed by which of the 5 K dimensions the conversation seems to have been at (though obviously connections across the K's are more important than each. Click any K to see what we have preserved. If you have found something that was at the old knowledgeboard that you want linked in to the 5 value multiplying dimensions of knowledge please mail to wcbn007@easynet.co.uk
Since knowledgeboard's future for humanity depended on what economists over the last 2 centuries have learnt about global and local media sectors, we briefly review this - more at value100:
investors stakes (including the peoples in such public media as the British Broadcasting Corporation) can be returned 100 fold over a generation but only if the medium multiplies 1000 fold value across the societies it connects, and does not exclude neighbouring societies from interacting (so their cultures and communities multiply transparently)
Always ask what the founders one or two main themes were, and whether the current meta-editorial team are still networking those themes (if not why and how will now be losing from spending time with the media if they assume its compounding the same cultural DNA and open leadership values as it originally planted). At value100 and FutureofLondon, and Beyond-Branding, we provide links to how such British media as The Economist and the BBC globalised, and we will also note that the birth of the worldwideweb depended on the British cultural philosophy of public media . Its as true withy how the future of a media sector evolves as it is at the top of a global corporation or a powerful nation that ultimately a few people make decisions on which the future welfare of millions or now billions is interconnected. Do these few love the future purpose and transparency and hi-trust that every humanly great institution that compounded over time once gravitated.
For example since most citizens' and netizens' lives are ruled by strictures of economics, we now need to inquire whether economics as a schooling is still stewarded the way those who originally chartered why women and men would always need constitutions enabling the most transparent possible searches and connections with how compound future exponentials are linked through time and the deepest historical beliefs humanity has come to communally trust (sometimes referred to with such terms as cultures and diversity and communion around social goodwill)
Today when we look at the world's 1000 biggest organisations of all typologies, we see a huge risk. Never have such a large percentage of the world's 1000 largest organisations deviated from their founding communal trusts - contexts that system*system mapmakers of these value exchanges turn into network pictures of gravitational epicentres around which connections of human relations of productivities (ehg K1*K2*K3*K4*K5) and demands.
Physical spaces like cities 1 2 3 4 need to be governed as a media (the people's spaces, cafe stages, forums and speakers corners (now most usually blogged)) model as much as any other type of model (eg transport/distribution or in the case of capitals a hub of how national constitutions interact sustainably for humanity). Indeed the ultimate challenge of sustaining 6 billion beings in productive and demanding joys has been mapped over 30 years of entrepreneurial revolution debates hosted by stewards of peoples economics as depending on the 2 million global village networking paradigm that Schumacher coined, linking with such truth-testing community and collaboration knowledge economics as Gandhi founded and Einstein endorsed and Johnny non Neumann assumed would be inspirationally interconnected for peoples around his catalytic intervention (obscene interest were his words for how much of his life he devoted to this collaboration technology) into the age of computing. In the example of the moon race, he would have been overjoyed at what productivity collaborative teams of people could achieve. Ever since he must be turning in his grave at how computers have been used by people with large financial budgets to cut people (tangible accounting's governing rule is to invest in machines and cut people). Never in the course of human history has the new collaborative economics, that could have multiplied service and action learning curves of 6 billion beings productive differences, been so opaquely desecrated by so few, professionally self-interested and backward sighted people.
posted by ... at 4:32 AM
0 comments
