Intro: Which of these connected coordinates of open productivities of knowledge and work do you want to cross-examine first:
K1*(individual being) K2*(group being - eg team)K3*(one systems gravity of leadership) K4* (global business sector's future for all peoples) K5* (how sustainability of local societies interacts with global sectors)
Latest posts: Feb 2006
The Networks of Messrs DeSkilling .. tell us at wcbn007@easynet.co.uk which searches you most value in this blog eg Drucker Love Commonwealth .. Are European leaders announcing any space races as revolutionary and imaginative as those of President Bush (version 2006)?
How the EU turned against Human KM -a case study in compounding economic destruction by investing in machines and power, whilst cutting down people and transparent networks.
Most of my learning (or knowledge exploring) around the value multipliers of peoples economics comes from reading my father's thousands of leaders at The Economist- many of these are freely useable today (eg the death of distance series are causing a new American Revolution as you click, whereas the Entrepreneurial Revolution catalogue were used as early as 1976 by Romano Prodi in leadership roundtables across Italy) to open up future history debates we could describe that flow into this weblog as being inspired by what Drucker meant by knowledge work and co-working and social ecology and against the kind of manager who empires over people with the IT budget or spreadsheeted numbers. Then my mother's family brings several generations of links with medicine and constitution of India and British Raj - not least that she would have been classified as Indian not British in nationality if my grandfather hadn't been responsible for doublechecking integrity of the constitutional laws which Britain drafted for India's independence. Kemp and Kemp: My mother's brother was also a lawyer whose crust was earned as a mediator of big business disputes; but whose hobby -or passion for good law - was to write up the precedents of compensation for people who suffered lifelong personal injury's. One of David's last crusades for individual rights provides the networking lead that unseated the British Lord Chancellor who almost destroyed personal injury compensation because his own understanding of compound arithmetic of lifetime costs was not as future-deep as it needed to be. Strangely to my mathematician's eyes for truth-testing connectivity: it is this misunderstanding of exponentials and potential risks to humanity due to compound loss of transparency mapping that is the weakest link and today globalization's greatest people risk wherever we cannot see wholy enough because lawyer or economist failed to sustain the highest trust by imposing rules that may have perfectly fit their past but were mathematically wrong to try to be precise about for evolving all our future's goodwill.
Others may want to understand the more nuanced leadership dialogues of 30 years of debates around Entrepreneurial Revolution (watch out for 2006 30th birthday parties, or help co-create one); Death of Distance network wires and future history scripts (22nd year young including humanity's sustainability Project30000 being collaboratively co-edited by bloggers at Club of Village * City * Country); or are latest professional work of goodwill mapping of global sector exponentials (where the future is upcurving or downcurving) due to contextually fit governance connecting the trust-flow of intangibles, network transparency across organisational boundaries, and global*local sustainability interactions which require a simultaneous end to economics of externalities being indulged by every top 10000 organisation. These are all dynamics that value exchange 1 2 mapping of valuetrue trasnparency communities can open source around any global industry context or network leader.Hi-trust investment over a generation returns 100 fold to investors but only by multiplying ever more value for society.
Chris Macrae, wcbn007@easynet.co.uk, http://kmeurope.blogspot.com

Monday, July 31, 2000

For 30 years, entrepreneurial revolution study groups- launched out of The Economist in 1976 - have been looking at abundancy and sustainability that the peoples economnics of a networking age can openly co-create if we can move beyond economics of scarcity and designed solely round making big power bigger however corrupting of trustworthy human and communal  relationships the compound consequences of superpower.


You can look at the various new economics of abundance that need networking together at our Future of London site, whose transparent mapping rationale is also introduce in Club of Village. Since 7/7 the future sustainability of any cross-cultural city (or community of people) and that of London have become the same co-creation challenge. So enabling everone to participate in hi-trust people's economics is a primary goal of London's initiative to be a collabortation knowledge city around which 2 million global vilages can grow in win-win-win harmony. ER dialogues convince us this is the only way open cross-cultural societies can defeat the 20th century's compound causes of terror as well as love each other. Moreover in 1984 we published a book on the timeline that needed to be integrated if the human race is to be sustainable beyond century 21 as networks take people global and local.


One of the big powers that needed to be opened up rather closed into separate boxes was professionals- especially those that society gave semi-monpoly licences to rule over us with emasurements or other laws. It was vital that a world ranking region developed an open virtual community where all peoples could see professions colaborating in simplicity as the peoples economics integrated historic valuation views including those where nations externalised great compound risks onto the elast knowledgeable. Death of didatnce we argued in our 1984 book would need to bridge such digital divides as one of the first priorities of a golden age of sercvice economy and multiplying learnin in use. Around the chnage of milennoium when the world got excited about the interenet it was vital that all 6 billion beings could see the best an open virtual comunity could be and in its 2010 knowledge society vision the EU provided a tewst case because its number 1 objective was claimed to be integrating 25 countries to be much more than their parts. A question was could knowledgeboard.com become such a community.


When I joined knowledgeboard in 2002 as a sub-editor of emotional intelligence and intangibles (human relations) valuation, not many conversations were going on. Chunky bits of research were being published by rival fund centres and te people behind the research were not even signed up to openly answer questions about their writings. Worse there was a Luxembourgan view that KM was about technology not people - which was hijacking all that Peter Drucker and other preneurila advocates belied knowledge work should be designed round so that the post-industrail revolution did not repeat the make the least of workers' humanity that the machine age had always made most money out of. Still the founders of knwoeldgeboared were vociferous that they wanted to explore cluetrianed type visions of virtual communities open sourcong professions and ssytemising interfaces between networks of excellence in simple and transparenct ways. We designed convesations around Human KM


and TRUST became the number 1 topic resonating through the community. So much so that this dymamkic of organising emotional literacy was soon given its own special interest community - the only time in KB histiry that a special interest had opened into another interest.


For a year or so, extraordinary knowledge angel networks blossomed with over a hundred people paying their own way to meet in London and Berlin and Luxembourg to debate the future of a humanistic knowledge management. They were encouraged to seek a small budget in the next round of EU funding and after thousands of days of volunteered time not only refused any budget but prevented from continuing to develop conversations in the area of the knowledgeboard community they had been invited to co-create. We have extracted here some souvenirs of what they used to celebrate colaboratively at knowledgeboard in those open days of 2002-2003


Unfortunately the top 10 most linkedin people to hi-trust dialogues were edged out between late 2003 and 2005, by the simple expediency of making every content host a volunteer apart from 6 or so paid for managers who intefered with the patterns of hi-trust open knowledge jamming and sought to stir jealous rivaries wherever they could influence community by rewarding closed debates and control of what got front page featuring. At least that's how it seems to me, as is illustrated by these final searches of what we had started. In a final coup de gras, in early january 2006, they also introduced a new version of KB in january 2006 wiping much of the communal conversations 2000-2005


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22human+km%22&btnG=Google+Search


The Most Human KM In Systems and Technology
The Most Human KM In Systems and Technology. [ ] [ Post Followup ] [ New Forums ] [
Discussion Index ]. Posted by BK Ghosh on December 31, 2002 at 14:42:50: ...
www.brint.com/wwwboard/messages/130101.html - 20k - Cached - Similar pages - Remove result


Re: The Most Human KM In Systems and Technology
Human KM which strengthens trust-flows (and intangibles valuation -well over 75% of
... That is the core cultural ssumption and "identity of why" Human KM ...
www.brint.com/wwwboard/messages/132325.html - 15k - Cached - Similar pages - Remove result
[ More results from www.brint.com ]


Zones and SIGS - Jan 21
Emotional Intelligence EI welcomes you to a world of Human KM where networks:
... Human KM, Emotional Intelligence, Governing the value multipliers of ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/community/zones/sig/kmei.html - 101k - Jan 22, 2006 - Cached - Similar pages - Remove result


KM on trial - 29 Oct 2004
one urgent human km areas is how we see- and openly catalogue, ... another human
KM is how we use all the different 'conversation modes' including virtual ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/ cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=132728&d=pnd - 49k - Cached - Similar pages - Remove result
[ More results from www.knowledgeboard.com ]


[PPT] Computer-Based Decision Support
File Format: Microsoft Powerpoint 7 - View as HTML
Enhance a decision maker’s knowledge management competence, supplementing human
KM skills with computer-based KM capabilities; DSSs in historical ...
www.uky.edu/BusinessEconomics/ dssakba/instmat/ppch5-6.ppt - Similar pages - Remove result

AOK: Conversations with Chris Macrae
... the conversation editors specialising in Emotional Intelligence that was the
first interest group concerned with Human KM as opposed to primarily ICT. ...
www.kwork.org/Stars/macrae.html - 23k - Cached - Similar pages - Remove result


[PDF] KM Sustainability:
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
enabler of the human KM process. Communities of. practice are the bedrocks of KM.
These points are not made to start a debate, but only to put the content ...
www.kwork.org/White_Papers/ash.pdf - Similar pages - Remove result


 


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sitesearch=knowledgeboard.com&q=trust&btnG=Search


Results 1 - 10 of about 10,400 from knowledgeboard.com for trust


KnowledgeBoard: the European Knowledge Management (KM) Community ...







To contribute to any other discussion on KM & Trust or launch a new ... Here, John Moore talks about trust as the flow which governs knowledge and ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/community/zones/sig/kmt.html - 27k - Cached - Similar pages


KM & TRUST







Can we trust NGOs w'out knowing their financiers? ... How to measure trust in your organisation. ... To trust or not to trust: the American Red Cross ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?topic=132 - 30k - Cached - Similar pages


KM & TRUST







Date:, 21-Nov-02 (GMT). Subject:, Re: Trust Success Stories (Replies: 0, Read: 102). From:, Chris Macrae · View my Who's Who entry · View my picture ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/cgi-bin/ forum.cgi?forum=0&topic=0&comment=511 - 32k - Cached - Similar pages


The Value of Trust - 01 Nov 2002







It’s hard to measure the value of trust in a relationship but we know the cost of losing it. This can be seen in our personal lives – for instance, ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/ cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=86659&d=pnd - 101k - Jan 22, 2006 - Cached - Similar pages


The Mechanics of Human Trust - 06 Jan 2004







In this article, Miguel Cornejo suggests that trust can be based on well-worn, everyday, commonplace things such as formal contracts and clear rules.
www.knowledgeboard.com/ cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=121434&d=pnd - 134k - Cached - Similar pages


KM & TRUST







Date:, 28-Nov-02 (GMT). Subject:, Re: Fun and Trust (Replies: 1, Read: 117). From:, Chris Macrae · View my Who's Who entry · View my picture ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/cgi-bin/ forum.cgi?forum=1&topic=132&comment=573 - 39k - Cached - Similar pages


KM & TRUST







Date:, 28-Nov-03 (GMT). Subject:, Substitutes of trust (Replies: 1, Read: 517). From:, John Moore · View my Who's Who entry · View my picture ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/cgi-bin/ forum.cgi?forum=0&topic=0&comment=1989 - 26k - Cached - Similar pages


KM & TRUST







KM & TRUST ... Frank Kouwe, whom I came in contact with through my article "Trust me! ... Subject:, Re: How to measure trust in your organisation. ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/cgi-bin/ forum.cgi?forum=0&topic=0&comment=528 - 38k - Cached - Similar pages


KM & TRUST







Date:, 30-Nov-03 (GMT). Subject:, substitutes of trust (Replies: 0, Read: 265). From:, joe kisby. Hi, john, thanks for your response, im basically doing a ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/cgi-bin/ forum.cgi?forum=0&topic=0&comment=1999 - 23k - Cached - Similar pages


KM & TRUST







Subject:, Re: Trust Success Stories - Buckman & blogging? (Replies: 0, Read: 415). From:, Mark Sharratt ... Led by John Moore. KM & Trust SIG> ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/cgi-bin/ forum.cgi?forum=0&topic=0&comment=1241 - 25k - Cached - Similar pages






 


KM & TRUST
Date:, 27-Nov-03 (GMT). Subject:, Substitutes of trust within teams (Replies: 2,
Read: 999) ... Subject:, Substitutes of trust (Replies: 1, Read: 521) ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/cgi-bin/ forum.cgi?forum=1&topic=132&comment=1988 - 28k - Cached - Similar pages


KM & TRUST
reference: debate on designing trust-worthy knowledge governance system.
Visitor Register Now. Editorial. Led by
John Moore. KM & Trust SIG> ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/cgi-bin/ forum.cgi?forum=1&topic=132&comment=796 - 25k - Cached - Similar pages


KM & TRUST
KM & TRUST ... Subject:, Can we trust NGOs w'out knowing their financiers? ...
The moral: shortcuts to trust can be dangerous; we need to pay attention to ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/cgi-bin/ forum.cgi?forum=0&topic=0&comment=1603 - 25k - Cached - Similar pages


KM & TRUST
KM & TRUST ... Subject:, Re: How to measure trust in your organisation. (Replies:
0, Read: 745). From:, Ton Zijlstra · View my Who's Who entry · View my ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/cgi-bin/ forum.cgi?forum=0&topic=0&comment=929 - 23k - Cached - Similar pages


#038 - The Trust Debate Continues - 10 Sep 2002
The KnowledgeBoard Newswire - Issue 038 Tuesday 10th September
http://www.knowledgeboard.com KnowledgeBoard - The European KM Community ... ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/ cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=92179&d=pnd - 33k - Cached - Similar pages


Trust me! I know what I’m doing. - 03 Oct 2002
In this article, Ton Zijlstra tries to summarize the discussion that was triggered
by
John Moores article The Value of Trust. Also a framework is provided ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/ cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=92181&d=pnd - 62k - Cached - Similar pages


KM & TRUST
Subject:, Trust, productivity and curiosity (Replies: 0, Read: 454). From:,
Simon Springate · View my Who's Who entry · View my picture ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/cgi-bin/ forum.cgi?forum=1&topic=132&comment=578 - 23k - Cached - Similar pages


Trust – Where Business Meets Its Karma - 29 Oct 2002
The focus of this article is the inter-organizational dimensions of trust, and
the assessment of its economic value and societal implications. ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/ cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=94963&d=pnd - 45k - Cached - Similar pages


KM's Evolution to Date & How Trust Enters the Subject by Ton ...
How do you see the history of Knowledge Management to date? Is the subject evolving
the way you would like? And is there an opportunity for Trust to give KM ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/ cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=91766&d=pnd - 49k - Cached - Similar pages


Tell us which contexts of trust matter to you - 28 Jul 2003
In our new book THE MAP of trust-flow governance and value multiplication we look
at how over 80% of value built or destroyed - in service, knowledge and ...
www.knowledgeboard.com/ cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=118003&d=pnd - 37k - Cached - Similar pages




 



 


 


 

Theming 5 dynamics of productivity
We explore & and share the latest tales at open spaces, and through project30000's global action villages and overall country maps co-edited in the 100 weblog netizen intitiative of collaboration knowledge city
The 5 Knowledge flowing energy levels connecting us are

  • K1 as people
  • K2 as groups (eg nets, communities) within or across large organisations
  • K3 as leadership visions, hierarchical led consensus
  • K4 as business sector partnerships including globalisation dynamics and networks as systems*systems
  • K5 grassroots sustainability up locally or across cultures : Drucker's social ecologies
  • K1*K2*K3*K4*K5 Pride of space goes to stories multiplying the best of all 5 productivity subsystems and systemically compounding hi-trust organisational futures