Intro: Which of these connected coordinates of open productivities of knowledge and work do you want to cross-examine first:
K1*(individual being) K2*(group being - eg team)K3*(one systems gravity of leadership) K4* (global business sector's future for all peoples) K5* (how sustainability of local societies interacts with global sectors)
Latest posts: Feb 2006
The Networks of Messrs DeSkilling .. tell us at wcbn007@easynet.co.uk which searches you most value in this blog eg Drucker Love Commonwealth .. Are European leaders announcing any space races as revolutionary and imaginative as those of President Bush (version 2006)?
How the EU turned against Human KM -a case study in compounding economic destruction by investing in machines and power, whilst cutting down people and transparent networks.
Most of my learning (or knowledge exploring) around the value multipliers of peoples economics comes from reading my father's thousands of leaders at The Economist- many of these are freely useable today (eg the death of distance series are causing a new American Revolution as you click, whereas the Entrepreneurial Revolution catalogue were used as early as 1976 by Romano Prodi in leadership roundtables across Italy) to open up future history debates we could describe that flow into this weblog as being inspired by what Drucker meant by knowledge work and co-working and social ecology and against the kind of manager who empires over people with the IT budget or spreadsheeted numbers. Then my mother's family brings several generations of links with medicine and constitution of India and British Raj - not least that she would have been classified as Indian not British in nationality if my grandfather hadn't been responsible for doublechecking integrity of the constitutional laws which Britain drafted for India's independence. Kemp and Kemp: My mother's brother was also a lawyer whose crust was earned as a mediator of big business disputes; but whose hobby -or passion for good law - was to write up the precedents of compensation for people who suffered lifelong personal injury's. One of David's last crusades for individual rights provides the networking lead that unseated the British Lord Chancellor who almost destroyed personal injury compensation because his own understanding of compound arithmetic of lifetime costs was not as future-deep as it needed to be. Strangely to my mathematician's eyes for truth-testing connectivity: it is this misunderstanding of exponentials and potential risks to humanity due to compound loss of transparency mapping that is the weakest link and today globalization's greatest people risk wherever we cannot see wholy enough because lawyer or economist failed to sustain the highest trust by imposing rules that may have perfectly fit their past but were mathematically wrong to try to be precise about for evolving all our future's goodwill.
Others may want to understand the more nuanced leadership dialogues of 30 years of debates around Entrepreneurial Revolution (watch out for 2006 30th birthday parties, or help co-create one); Death of Distance network wires and future history scripts (22nd year young including humanity's sustainability Project30000 being collaboratively co-edited by bloggers at Club of Village * City * Country); or are latest professional work of goodwill mapping of global sector exponentials (where the future is upcurving or downcurving) due to contextually fit governance connecting the trust-flow of intangibles, network transparency across organisational boundaries, and global*local sustainability interactions which require a simultaneous end to economics of externalities being indulged by every top 10000 organisation. These are all dynamics that value exchange 1 2 mapping of valuetrue trasnparency communities can open source around any global industry context or network leader.Hi-trust investment over a generation returns 100 fold to investors but only by multiplying ever more value for society.
Chris Macrae, wcbn007@easynet.co.uk, http://kmeurope.blogspot.com

Sunday, July 31, 2005

In London Change Global Village 2 0f 5, I met the coordinator of Tomorrows Global Company this month and voluntered to connect our networks with his initiative to form an interesting leadership benchmarking study group

Could we get to know 30 companies with greatest human potential?
Could we get to know 30 companies with greatest human potential?
Imagine this is like a fantasy league table. All nominations and transparency questions about nominations welcome. In view of what evidence is supllied, league table positions will go up and down.
1 Google whose role currently leads what the people can make of bringing degrees of separtaion down on the internet - eg explore co-mentoring
2 Interface -who has turned industrial carpets into one of America's favourite companies to work for and persuades that there is no business case worth leading if valuing human life is externalised from a sector's compound future vision
3 Toyota -who remains the archtypal company for making 100000 different models of car more interesting and so better quality and lower cost than American companies who try to make people and machine starmeline round 1000 models. Also the number 1 case in a book written seevral years by an accountant expliaing all the errors of perpetuating 19th C accounting brules in a 21st C world.
4 on who would you say?
Chris Macrae


Inspirations Log:"In my life now, I am obsessed with only two things: I don't want anybody to die before their time. And I don't want to see good people spend their energies without making a difference...You can change the reality of human history by systemic action...Our mission in this new century is clear. For good or ill, we live in an interdependent world. We can't escape each other. Therefore, we have to spend our lives building a global community of shared responsibilities, shared values, shared benefits."- William J. Clinton- references 1,,2


Attachments: (No. of attachments - 2)
29 k
valuation charter
valuation charter- the system error in current world trade, national politic and drowing grassroot communal integrity in fear and distrust. Can we see a way to map how to govern trust-flow in time? (02-Jun-05)
131 k
sustainabilityinvestment
sustainability investment - an open source blue-green paper (03-Jun-05)
KnowledgeBoard, 1st June 2005Categories: KM and Emotional Intelligence SIG, Any AnswersPublished by: Chris MacraeStory read: 1403

posted by ... at 7:16 AM 0 comments

Theming 5 dynamics of productivity
We explore & and share the latest tales at open spaces, and through project30000's global action villages and overall country maps co-edited in the 100 weblog netizen intitiative of collaboration knowledge city
The 5 Knowledge flowing energy levels connecting us are

  • K1 as people
  • K2 as groups (eg nets, communities) within or across large organisations
  • K3 as leadership visions, hierarchical led consensus
  • K4 as business sector partnerships including globalisation dynamics and networks as systems*systems
  • K5 grassroots sustainability up locally or across cultures : Drucker's social ecologies
    •

    K1*K2*K3*K4*K5 Pride of space goes to stories multiplying the best of all 5 productivity subsystems and systemically compounding hi-trust organisational futures