Intro: Which of these connected coordinates of open productivities of knowledge and work do you want to cross-examine first:
K1*(individual being) K2*(group being - eg team)K3*(one systems gravity of leadership) K4* (global business sector's future for all peoples) K5* (how sustainability of local societies interacts with global sectors)
Latest posts: Feb 2006
The Networks of Messrs DeSkilling .. tell us at wcbn007@easynet.co.uk which searches you most value in this blog eg Drucker Love Commonwealth .. Are European leaders announcing any space races as revolutionary and imaginative as those of President Bush (version 2006)?
How the EU turned against Human KM -a case study in compounding economic destruction by investing in machines and power, whilst cutting down people and transparent networks.
Most of my learning (or knowledge exploring) around the value multipliers of peoples economics comes from reading my father's thousands of leaders at The Economist- many of these are freely useable today (eg the death of distance series are causing a new American Revolution as you click, whereas the Entrepreneurial Revolution catalogue were used as early as 1976 by Romano Prodi in leadership roundtables across Italy) to open up future history debates we could describe that flow into this weblog as being inspired by what Drucker meant by knowledge work and co-working and social ecology and against the kind of manager who empires over people with the IT budget or spreadsheeted numbers. Then my mother's family brings several generations of links with medicine and constitution of India and British Raj - not least that she would have been classified as Indian not British in nationality if my grandfather hadn't been responsible for doublechecking integrity of the constitutional laws which Britain drafted for India's independence. Kemp and Kemp: My mother's brother was also a lawyer whose crust was earned as a mediator of big business disputes; but whose hobby -or passion for good law - was to write up the precedents of compensation for people who suffered lifelong personal injury's. One of David's last crusades for individual rights provides the networking lead that unseated the British Lord Chancellor who almost destroyed personal injury compensation because his own understanding of compound arithmetic of lifetime costs was not as future-deep as it needed to be. Strangely to my mathematician's eyes for truth-testing connectivity: it is this misunderstanding of exponentials and potential risks to humanity due to compound loss of transparency mapping that is the weakest link and today globalization's greatest people risk wherever we cannot see wholy enough because lawyer or economist failed to sustain the highest trust by imposing rules that may have perfectly fit their past but were mathematically wrong to try to be precise about for evolving all our future's goodwill.
Others may want to understand the more nuanced leadership dialogues of 30 years of debates around Entrepreneurial Revolution (watch out for 2006 30th birthday parties, or help co-create one); Death of Distance network wires and future history scripts (22nd year young including humanity's sustainability Project30000 being collaboratively co-edited by bloggers at Club of Village * City * Country); or are latest professional work of goodwill mapping of global sector exponentials (where the future is upcurving or downcurving) due to contextually fit governance connecting the trust-flow of intangibles, network transparency across organisational boundaries, and global*local sustainability interactions which require a simultaneous end to economics of externalities being indulged by every top 10000 organisation. These are all dynamics that value exchange 1 2 mapping of valuetrue trasnparency communities can open source around any global industry context or network leader.Hi-trust investment over a generation returns 100 fold to investors but only by multiplying ever more value for society.
Chris Macrae, wcbn007@easynet.co.uk, http://kmeurope.blogspot.com

Thursday, January 12, 2006

K1 Productivity of Individual or Family Generations

On which do we want to spend our lifetime's work and learning curves?
Economic of abundance or of scarcity?


Knowledge slaves to machines or open learning management?



Microsoft Word
234 k
chrismacrae
ABSTRACT
Let the networks Zing. The New Economy's ressurrection depends on introducing a 2nd Hi-Trust governance system that compounds WHealth by connecting Wealth & Health in every decision, action, communication & learning. Sustaining Unseen Wealth is simple for people to do if you will permit maps which give a whole perspective of organisational gravity that looks much more like a double helix than one way command and control linear economics, accounting and strategy. We need zero tolerance of slios and loving care at boundaries which is where the greatest value multipliers interface. We need context, and suggest cafe formats (& for major organsiation-wide transfoermations - open space technology ) that any industry sector can openly play with to enjoy the divesrity's most valuable futures and make the narrowest means look very 20th Century.  (05-Jun-05)




It's possible to go into any large funded institution that has a web-board eg the EU's www.knowledgeboard.com and you will quickly see which type of discussions are being moderated  , usually the more so freedom of speech is claimed!


Link to extracts from in-community conversations where people are zinging for humanity and the greatest innovation projects:

Ask the power that be a challenging question like what progress have you made in answering the Unseen Wealth question raised by economists at Brookings and scholars of law at the stsrt of this century - over 90% of all future value is not being governed by the information that people at the top of big organsiations are being drowned in by audotprs and hard professions. Have you improved that compound sdisastger or worsened it in the last 5 years. You think that some people might see that questions like that define whether there will be life on earth 3,2,1 generations out. And fortunately some people do but we need to celebrate in community boards where people do keep connecting their views. Why be virtually prejudiced. At least half an hour of every day you mumble jumble polite no-sequeitors in real life just to keep social relationships going. Please don't join us in other virtula communities unless you know at least one of when to contribute a lot and when to listen a lot, and above all to dare raising simply the biggest connecting questions not complexify separation with the smallest (academic) off comment interruptions.


 


 


 


Economics &&&&Emotional Intelligence

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Theming 5 dynamics of productivity
We explore & and share the latest tales at open spaces, and through project30000's global action villages and overall country maps co-edited in the 100 weblog netizen intitiative of collaboration knowledge city
The 5 Knowledge flowing energy levels connecting us are

  • K1 as people
  • K2 as groups (eg nets, communities) within or across large organisations
  • K3 as leadership visions, hierarchical led consensus
  • K4 as business sector partnerships including globalisation dynamics and networks as systems*systems
  • K5 grassroots sustainability up locally or across cultures : Drucker's social ecologies
  • K1*K2*K3*K4*K5 Pride of space goes to stories multiplying the best of all 5 productivity subsystems and systemically compounding hi-trust organisational futures