Intro: Which of these connected coordinates of open productivities of knowledge and work do you want to cross-examine first:
K1*(individual being) K2*(group being - eg team)K3*(one systems gravity of leadership) K4* (global business sector's future for all peoples) K5* (how sustainability of local societies interacts with global sectors)
Latest posts: Feb 2006
The Networks of Messrs DeSkilling .. tell us at wcbn007@easynet.co.uk which searches you most value in this blog eg Drucker Love Commonwealth .. Are European leaders announcing any space races as revolutionary and imaginative as those of President Bush (version 2006)?
How the EU turned against Human KM -a case study in compounding economic destruction by investing in machines and power, whilst cutting down people and transparent networks.
Most of my learning (or knowledge exploring) around the value multipliers of peoples economics comes from reading my father's thousands of leaders at The Economist- many of these are freely useable today (eg the death of distance series are causing a new American Revolution as you click, whereas the Entrepreneurial Revolution catalogue were used as early as 1976 by Romano Prodi in leadership roundtables across Italy) to open up future history debates we could describe that flow into this weblog as being inspired by what Drucker meant by knowledge work and co-working and social ecology and against the kind of manager who empires over people with the IT budget or spreadsheeted numbers. Then my mother's family brings several generations of links with medicine and constitution of India and British Raj - not least that she would have been classified as Indian not British in nationality if my grandfather hadn't been responsible for doublechecking integrity of the constitutional laws which Britain drafted for India's independence. Kemp and Kemp: My mother's brother was also a lawyer whose crust was earned as a mediator of big business disputes; but whose hobby -or passion for good law - was to write up the precedents of compensation for people who suffered lifelong personal injury's. One of David's last crusades for individual rights provides the networking lead that unseated the British Lord Chancellor who almost destroyed personal injury compensation because his own understanding of compound arithmetic of lifetime costs was not as future-deep as it needed to be. Strangely to my mathematician's eyes for truth-testing connectivity: it is this misunderstanding of exponentials and potential risks to humanity due to compound loss of transparency mapping that is the weakest link and today globalization's greatest people risk wherever we cannot see wholy enough because lawyer or economist failed to sustain the highest trust by imposing rules that may have perfectly fit their past but were mathematically wrong to try to be precise about for evolving all our future's goodwill.
Others may want to understand the more nuanced leadership dialogues of 30 years of debates around Entrepreneurial Revolution (watch out for 2006 30th birthday parties, or help co-create one); Death of Distance network wires and future history scripts (22nd year young including humanity's sustainability Project30000 being collaboratively co-edited by bloggers at Club of Village * City * Country); or are latest professional work of goodwill mapping of global sector exponentials (where the future is upcurving or downcurving) due to contextually fit governance connecting the trust-flow of intangibles, network transparency across organisational boundaries, and global*local sustainability interactions which require a simultaneous end to economics of externalities being indulged by every top 10000 organisation. These are all dynamics that value exchange 1 2 mapping of valuetrue trasnparency communities can open source around any global industry context or network leader.Hi-trust investment over a generation returns 100 fold to investors but only by multiplying ever more value for society.
Chris Macrae, wcbn007@easynet.co.uk, http://kmeurope.blogspot.com

Saturday, January 28, 2006

Value exchange theory provides the simplest mathematical standard for checking out the majority of exponentially compounding wealth factors the board cannot see with tradtional (tangible, transactional, machine-age) accounting and any other 20th C metrics that fail to be systemic

Here are the five most common failures of startegy that we can expect leadership teams to experience if they do not develop corporate goverenance aroun value exchnage theory

  • Does the strategy interact with what exponential the company's value multiplying trajectory is on. If you are dwntitling towards value destruction, the strategy you most urgently need will systemically intervene and resolve conflicts. Conversely, if you are far along an upward exponential, all sorts of companies wil come out of the woodworks wanting to partner with you; most won't be anywhere near as conflict free as you are; and their conflicts can easily spread cancerously destroying previoulsy deep trust-flows of your productive and demanding relationship system.
  • Do people learn from strategy and strategy learn from people?
  • Is service and teamwork consistently and emotionally energised by strategy and vice versa?
  • Is a network of business partners resilience and innovative adaptability made transparent by strategy and vice versa?
  • Does a society sustainably benefit from a firm’s strategy and vice versa?

I know all the leading suppliers of value exchange theory, and am delighted to guide you round who you need if any of the above risks are relevant now you've read about them.

chris macrae, wcbn007@easynet.co.uk

Tuesday, January 17, 2006


What are your favourite searches of unexpected twins?

1 Beyond Budgets -reason: valuetrue map's first principle of intangibles -these are the disciplines that connect through trust-flow if they are to be actioned, learnt and chnage just ahead of time where all the co-workers of an organsiation need to systemically transform

2 organisation/organization diseases - a phrase soon encountered by trust-flow students including those of Daniel Goleman and Emotional Intelligence/Literacy of Leadership genres

Thursday, January 12, 2006

K1 jottings on how the valuation of personal productivity is changing

really big trick is to measure emotions- a group like http://www.antidote.org.uk does for education and healthcare

and frankly I think we all can - you know how some groups of people have buzz and other dont; systems are blunt things whether at team or corporate levels; they tend to only compound one of 2 things

all the greatest emotions - trust (eg no disconnects in service or activating knowledge), courage (eg no fear of innovation or passing bad news up hierarchy), open participation (whole system purpose: multidisciplinary, multicultural, listening's loops as well as action learning's), joy (what sustains lifelong service and adaptivity around making a difference) ~ BUZZ

all the opposite ~ UNBUZZ

moreover psychologists have repeatedly shown that a customer knows how a boss tgreats an employee by the way that the employee treats the customer, and other flows which explain why separability is the worst possible mathematical assumption to make in valuing intangibles - ie intangibles map with the connectivity operand of multiplication unlike tangiles that can be reported with addition (the operation of separabilty)

moreover the chief economist of the work foundation now has ample proof for the statement : in developed countries service economies, an underperforming organisation is now 90% likely to be a system problem of management and governance and only 10% of the time a worker problem - how it is that so many national governments care of duty for their peoples can tolerate so much job cutting given this fact without ever holding top management more to account is amazing unless your reading of systems authorities concludes that measurement professions advising .gov are as bust as of .com - look at the exponentials of sector after sector or the ocnsequences for pensioners to be and society who are always dependent on hi-trust and long-run compound health productive & demanding relationship systems NOT speculative periods of performing

but if you really need one number of personal productivity, then Csik... below has the most convincing one yet known to our networks of mathematical and prenuurial searchers - what % of an individual's time is being spent at the experiental edge of her of his deepest competences

so the observant - indeed anyone using their human senses before they use numbers - can 'measure' the communal spirit- and the interesting thing is this is the number 1 correlator with whether the future of that group of people is growing or going down

The manifesto ofThe EQ Economy The Giants & their networks who proved Emotions Compound Most of the Value Multiplication of Advanced Economies1,,2,,3,,4,,5,,6

EXPLORING EMOTIONAL INTERACTIONS Emotional Intelligence








K1 Productivity of Individual or Family Generations

On which do we want to spend our lifetime's work and learning curves?
Economic of abundance or of scarcity?


Knowledge slaves to machines or open learning management?



Microsoft Word
234 k
chrismacrae
ABSTRACT
Let the networks Zing. The New Economy's ressurrection depends on introducing a 2nd Hi-Trust governance system that compounds WHealth by connecting Wealth & Health in every decision, action, communication & learning. Sustaining Unseen Wealth is simple for people to do if you will permit maps which give a whole perspective of organisational gravity that looks much more like a double helix than one way command and control linear economics, accounting and strategy. We need zero tolerance of slios and loving care at boundaries which is where the greatest value multipliers interface. We need context, and suggest cafe formats (& for major organsiation-wide transfoermations - open space technology ) that any industry sector can openly play with to enjoy the divesrity's most valuable futures and make the narrowest means look very 20th Century.  (05-Jun-05)




It's possible to go into any large funded institution that has a web-board eg the EU's www.knowledgeboard.com and you will quickly see which type of discussions are being moderated  , usually the more so freedom of speech is claimed!


Link to extracts from in-community conversations where people are zinging for humanity and the greatest innovation projects:

Ask the power that be a challenging question like what progress have you made in answering the Unseen Wealth question raised by economists at Brookings and scholars of law at the stsrt of this century - over 90% of all future value is not being governed by the information that people at the top of big organsiations are being drowned in by audotprs and hard professions. Have you improved that compound sdisastger or worsened it in the last 5 years. You think that some people might see that questions like that define whether there will be life on earth 3,2,1 generations out. And fortunately some people do but we need to celebrate in community boards where people do keep connecting their views. Why be virtually prejudiced. At least half an hour of every day you mumble jumble polite no-sequeitors in real life just to keep social relationships going. Please don't join us in other virtula communities unless you know at least one of when to contribute a lot and when to listen a lot, and above all to dare raising simply the biggest connecting questions not complexify separation with the smallest (academic) off comment interruptions.


 


 


 


Economics &&&&Emotional Intelligence

Sunday, January 01, 2006

After 3 years of surveying who around Europe might want knowledge management actually to serve knowledge workers, knowledge societies and to peacefully value multiply trade across nations upwards and not downwards, this is the end of 2005 report I am sending to people I trust most as wanting to help all peoples make a difference..do you know anyone esle I should be sending it to?

Happy New Year to You
My conflict resolution and transparency network valuation friends are developing several real & virtual movements to take back true mathematics of governance both of what world industry sector visions do to compound best consequences for people and to gravitate grassroots community projects

Four of our approaches may interest you most because they provide uniquely urgent open collaboration opportunities

2006 is the 30th anniversary of my father's survey in The Economis http://entrepreneurialrevolution.blogspot.com/ - we invite anyone who believes in the preneurial or system revoution methods of future hsitorians and peoples economics to co-script one-apgers with us. There are at least 5 types of people-centred preneurial revolutions that interest us and through which we seek to chnage economics as first discussed in 1984 here
entrepreneur remains the most popular word in the vocabulary for rapidly changing economic structures, something that is now going beyond urgency

2006 is also the 10th anniversary of learning and living brand architectures and goodwill - a genre I estanblised with my 1996 book http://brandchartering.blogspot.com

My father and I's 1984 book on the future integration of people learning networks and globalisation http://www.normanmacrae.com/netfuture.html#Anchor-Changin-27687forecasts that we would need to open source 30000 projects http://project30000.blogspot.com/to end extreme poverty and compounding of terror by 2010 - as Queen Elisabeth said in her christmas speech 2005http://futureoflondon.blogspot.com/ shows a year where humanity is turning against itself; this is as forecast back in 1984 and will continue unless 30000 colaboration projects are up and running by 2010

Finally we are extending collaboration knowledge city ideas which now produce 20 million google links to maps of country who''s who of sustainability through eg http://clubofusa.blogspot.com/ and http://clubofcity.blogspot.com/
Perhaps you indicate to me whether any of these 4 arenas interest you, and if so who we should form small email discussion groups with in KM land since many of these people are drifting into coflict with the knowledge worker construct that my father and Peter Drucker http://normanmacrae.blogspot.com/ intended to blen with preneurs. It is time to see whether such bossiness can be prevented for the sake of all who truly want learning networks to flourish so everyine can find their best co-mentors and help others do likewise, which is the core reason why the net and the web can multiply value exponentials up and not down
cheers chris macrae, wcbn007@easynet.co.uk

Family Knowledge Of Exponentials of Economic Systems up to 2005

My friends and I have chronicled a lot of my father's years up to 75 at A & B

1976 began conversational dialogues around Entrepreneurial Revolution published in The Economist. 2006 is the 30th birthday party of such open scripting and has now branched into 5 types of preneurial revolution, most foretold in the book I co-authored in 1984 on why networks and globalisation would revolutionise the peoples economics we will need to be sustainable - see 1 2 3 4

During the 1980s I was the first English guy to help a French firm compile a database of million hours of interviews with societies worldwide on what they culturally needed from globalisation. This I wrote up as the revolutions of world class branding, chartering the service economy -to live & learn - brand architecture, and co-authored brand knowledge identities needed in a networking age under such titles as Beyond-Branding, Total Corporate Brand Responsibility; THE MAP for Valuation of Trust-Flow*Transparency*Sustainability -email me at wcbn007@easynet.co.uk if you have inquiries on how all these human disciplines need to intercobnnect if we are to upcurve thye exponentials of global sectors instead of compounding a future in which "humanity turns on itself" (Queen Elizabeth -end of year 2005 message to friends of Britain and Commonwealth) Or Visit the 5 village networks of London's future and tell us if your city's peoples want to map something similar in terms of its collaboration interactions around the world.

For a retirement hooby dad also wrote a biography of Johny von Neumann and his hopes that compiters would compound an age where people united in the greater vision of collaboration knowledge city than the national competition obssession that turned out to have been the 20th Century's great british hangover.

e + 0 Economist

Emotional Intelligence

Theming 5 dynamics of productivity
We explore & and share the latest tales at open spaces, and through project30000's global action villages and overall country maps co-edited in the 100 weblog netizen intitiative of collaboration knowledge city
The 5 Knowledge flowing energy levels connecting us are

  • K1 as people
  • K2 as groups (eg nets, communities) within or across large organisations
  • K3 as leadership visions, hierarchical led consensus
  • K4 as business sector partnerships including globalisation dynamics and networks as systems*systems
  • K5 grassroots sustainability up locally or across cultures : Drucker's social ecologies
  • K1*K2*K3*K4*K5 Pride of space goes to stories multiplying the best of all 5 productivity subsystems and systemically compounding hi-trust organisational futures